Articles Posted in General Business Issues

The answer to this question for most San Diego business owners is unfortunately yes.  The last thing any business owner wants to think about is taxes and nothing could be worse than thinking about taxes four times a year.  Yet putting money aside to cover a tax bill isn’t the worst layout a business owner can make during any given year.  One way or another, Uncle Sam is going to get his percentage.  It would be better of course to keep those quarterly tax payments in the bank earning interest, but in the grander scheme of things the lost interest is negligible for most new and growing businesses.  Regardless, the IRS requires quarterly payments and exacts penalties and interest from those that ignore or are ignorant of the code.  

The big question then becomes, how much?  If you expect a first year loss or very limited net income and expect to owe less than $1,000 in taxes, you don’t have to worry.  If you expect to owe more than $1,000, then you should pay quarterly estimated taxes to avoid penalties.  The IRS expects you to pay, at a minimum, the smaller of:  90% of the tax to be shown on your next year’s return or 100% of the tax shown on your last year’s tax return, if that return covered all 12 months of the year.  If your prior year’s adjusted gross income exceeded $75,000 on your individual return, or $150,000 with your spouse, the 100% is changed to 110%.  

Taxes_911375.jpgExisting businesses can choose the second option and make quarterly payments that equal 100% of the prior year’s tax payment (or 110% if the prior year’s adjusted gross income was in the higher bracket) and forego performing complex calculations.  If your business is in its first year or expects to earn considerably less than the prior year and you are uncertain how to proceed, consult your accountant (preferably a CPA who should be an important part of your business’ team of advisors).  You may also personally use the IRS 1040EZ worksheet to estimate your tax due for the following year, but you will want to be sure that you make a good estimate of your business’ income.  A good accountant can ensure that you legally minimize your tax burden and avoid penalties.  

Starting and running your own San Diego business is as challenging as it is rewarding.  At every turn, business owners are faced with new obstacles and it often seems like every choice is a make or break decision.  This is precisely why it is so important that young and growing businesses are supported by trusted advisors.  A team of professionals experienced in banking, accounting, payroll, insurance and the law reduces the friction young and growing businesses are certain to bump up against moving forward.  While it obviously may not be practical for every new business to retain and/or hire a complete staff of professionals, understanding the important role each professional plays in the business world is essential.  As a business grows, having a complete team is the only way to ensure that the business is protected from potential liabilities.
939163___umbrella__.jpgBanking:  Choosing the right bank is especially important in those early months of operation.  At the very least, you want the branch manager to know you by name.  It’s helpful to do a preliminary internet search and see what others are saying about the banks in your area.  Local community banks often offer more personalized service.  Ultimately, you want to know that you can get someone on the phone that knows you and cares about your needs.
Insurance:  No matter what type of business you run and whether or not you believe your personal assets are protected through the formation of a formal business entity (i.e. a corporation or a limited liability company), obtaining adequate insurance at the onset is a necessity.  Even where companies comply with the legal formalities necessary to ensure personal assets are protected from liability, no entrepreneur is interested in losing their initial investment as the result of a single event.  Workers compensation insurance (if you hire employees), health insurance, life insurance (especially for partnerships), general liability insurance, property insurance, auto insurance, and malpractice insurance are all important.  Finding the right insurance agent, particularly one that has experience insuring your type of business ensures that you obtain the proper types and levels of coverage.  Develop a relationship with an agent you trust.

Accounting and Payroll:  While many entrepreneurs see the hiring of accounting and payroll personnel as a luxury especially at the onset, as a business grows so does its need for accurate books and quality management.  The company’s taxes, borrowing power and stability depend on fundamental accounting methods and compliance with state and federal employment regulations.  If it is impractical to hire accounting and human resource personnel at first, consider outsourcing the work.  There are exceptionally cost effective companies out there that cater to the young and growing business.  

Legal Services:  Because your business will make routine decisions that have legal consequences, it is critical that an attorney is on your team of advisors from the start.  Your attorney will provide invaluable guidance in determining levels of insurance coverage, determining the type of business entity to form, developing employee policies, complying with federal, state and local law and regulation, drafting and negotiating contracts and protecting your company’s intellectual property such as your company’s name.  This list is not exhaustive.  Develop a relationship early on with an attorney that you can trust, and ask that he or she give your business a legal check up.  This can usually be done for a reasonable fee.  Be sure that the attorney understands your business model, long term goals and marketing plan.  Talk to other business owners in your area for references. In the end, it is important that you are protected from unforeseen complications.

Most existing San Diego businesses rely heavily on name recognition but it is surprising how many fail to protect this invaluable commodity.  This is due in part to the fear most business owners have with the idea of consulting an attorney and in part to a lack of understanding of the protections available to them.  The hesitation in hiring an attorney is understandable and needs no explanation.  This article focuses on delineating the steps businesses should take, and emphasizes the importance of obtaining Federal Trademark protection.  

iStock_000011229024XSmall.jpgThe first step any business takes is to form a business entity.  If the business entity is a formal entity registered with the State of California such as a Corporation or Limited Liability Company (LLC), the business’ name automatically becomes “Business, Inc.” or “Business, LLC” and, assuming the name is not already in use, no one else in California can form the same business entity with the same name.  In some instances, corporations and LLCs operate under different names.  For example, “Business, Inc.” may run a clothing outlet called “Boutique”.  To protect the name “Boutique”, the corporation will register a Fictitious Name (“Doing Business As” or “DBA”) with the County in which the company will do business.  The DBA allows the corporation to open a bank account for “Boutique” and prevents local competitors from registering the same fictitious name.  Sole proprietors and partnerships that are not registered with the State of California also obtain “Fictitious Names”.  Most business owners either form a formal business entity or obtain a DBA.  They understand the protections formal business entities offer and know that at the very least a DBA is necessary to open a business bank account.  Unfortunately, most businesses stop here leaving their business name vulnerable to attack.  To avoid costly litigation and protect the goodwill and earned clientele associated with the business name, businesses should consider obtaining federal trademark protection.  

Long time business owners that have established a distinctive name first are offered some protection through what is termed a “common law” trademark, at least within the geographical area that the name is used.  However, any first in time federally registered trademark will take precedence over your mark regardless of the geographical area of use.  The creation of a federal trademark creates a rebuttable presumption that the trademark has priority over all other claims nationwide.  So on the pyramid of protections, the federal trademark is the ultimate protection.  Even where common law trademarks are enforceable, they will be limited to the geographic area in which they were in use prior to the registration of a federal trademark.  This obviously places limitations on the expansion of your business.  Moreover, with emerging and uncertain internet law, a business’ ability to protect its name and mark on the internet is constrained further.  It is unclear today whether a local San Diego business can operate a website using its common law protected name where another company holds a federal trademark for the same name.  The San Diego website is obviously accessible nationwide.  

Trading “sweat equity” for a share in ownership of a California Limited Liability Company (LLC) or Partnership is common these days particularly because the recession is forcing people out of the main stream work force and into creative forms of income generation.  Trading “sweat equity” is a practical way for financial investors and motivated human capital to combine forces to start and/or grow a new business.  Unfortunately, most people are unaware of the potential pitfalls and move forward without any thought to potential conflicts between partners or the tax consequences.

Corporate formalities 4.jpgThere is little doubt that new and growing businesses benefit from sweat equity.  The young business gets an infusion of much needed human capital and the sweat equity provider earns ownership.  It’s a win-win situation for the fledgling LLC or Partnership.  However, business owners considering trading ownership for sweat equity need to be acutely aware of two important issues.  

First, it’s critical that the economic relationship between the members or partners be clearly defined in the LLC’s operating agreement or in the partnership agreement.  Otherwise, the business’ future will be froth with peril.  The company must anticipate potential conflicts that would arise should for instance the sweat equity partner fail to perform as expected or either partner expose the company to liability.  A well drafted LLC operating agreement or partnership reduces the possibility of future conflict and/or litigation.  A partnership attorney will ensure that all eventualities are addressed.  

Second, the sweat equity partner (the person trading sweat for equity) is in effect earning dollars that she is trading for a percentage ownership in the business (her capital contribution).  This is a complex issue that has important tax implications.  In the simplest terms, the dollars earned are taxed when the ownership is vested and the tax will be based on the value of the percentage ownership in the LLC or Partnership at the time. For example, say the LLC was formed by a member who contributed $50,000 for 50% ownership and a sweat equity member who contributes one year’s future services valued at $50,000 for 50% ownership.  The $50,000 is compensation for services and is considered taxable income.  This can have a sizeable impact on the sweat equity’s tax burden.  Moreover, if the company never proves profitable, it’s much like paying tax on phantom income. 
Continue reading

The excitement that comes with starting your first business is most often tempered by the myriad of critical decisions you have to make.  New businesses are sprouting up all over San Diego, and a common question for young entrepreneurs is “How do I pay myself?”  The question is usually asked well after the new business is underway.  It is common for new business owners to forge ahead with the expectation that as soon as they see a profit, they’ll simply pay themselves.  However, as they think more about “how much” and “how” to pay themselves, they begin to wonder just how to accomplish the task.  Do they withdraw profits for themselves?  If so, can they do this any time or must they wait until year’s end?  Do they pay themselves a salary including the withdrawal of state and federal deductions?  What are the tax consequences?  What about my partner?  

The answer depends on your business’ structure.  If you have formed a corporation, you wouldCorporate formalities 5.jpg typically pay yourself as the corporation would pay any employee including the withdrawal of state and federal deductions.  You would also have the option of paying out dividends.  Determining what to pay and how to pay yourself requires careful consideration of the corporation’s anticipated profits.  It makes little sense to pay yourself more than the corporation makes (whether via salary or dividends).  The decision becomes more complicated if you have multiple shareholders but your Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws should be set up to clearly address management compensation and dividends.  

As a sole proprietor, you pay yourself a draw from the company profits.  When and the amount you draw from the business has no tax implications.  You and the company are the same entity for tax purposes, and you pay yourself whatever you like.  However, the ability to pay yourself and whether paying yourself makes good business sense are two different things.  Withdrawing all of the company’s revenues leaving the company unable to pay expenses is never a good idea.  It’s also important to know that what you pay yourself is not an expense for tax purposes.  You don’t get to write it off.  For a single member Limited Liability Company (LLC), you would pay yourself exactly the same way as you would for a sole proprietorship.  LLC’s are considered pass through entities (as long as you did not elect to be taxed as a corporation) which means you are taxed the same as if you were a sole proprietor – you pay yourself a draw from the company profits.  

Organizing a workforce for your San Diego business presents formidable challenges.  One of those challenges is deciding whether to hire staff as independent contractors or as regular employees.  Obviously, there are fiscal advantages to hiring independent contractors.  For those workers classified as “employees”, withholdings, payroll taxes, worker’s compensation, and compliance with labor laws generally add about 18% to your payroll costs, and this is exclusive of employee benefits.  Hiring independent contractors is an appealing alternative, but it’s not as simple as treating all workers as “independent contractors”.  Federal and State law dictates whether a worker is an “independent contractor” or an “employee”.  

Employees2.jpg

When the time comes to hire staff, it is crucial that businesses ensure that workers are properly classified under Federal and State law.  Even large corporations have fallen victim to the assumption that classification of its workers as independent contractors was appropriate.  Microsoft Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, Time Warner, Allstate and FedEx have all borne the cost of litigation regarding the misclassification of workers.  Since 2007, estimates of settlements in worker misclassification cases approach one billion dollars.  Nonetheless, employers continue to opt for the “independent contractor” classification while treating staff as employees opening themselves to significant tax liabilities, interest and penalties.  

Part of the problem lies in the ambiguity in existing regulation lending to subjective determinations.  In California, the Employment Development Department offers the following guidelines for the definition of an “employee”:  the employer has the right to discharge the worker at will; the work is usually done under supervision; the worker does not provide the tools, equipment, or place of work; the worker is paid based on time worked or piece rate; the worker has little or no meaningful discretion on how to do the job; and the worker does the same kind of work as that which is the principal production of the company.

Under these guidelines, it is easy for unwary employers to convince themselves that they are properly classifying workers as independent contractors.  This is often done through rose colored glasses without fully understanding the consequences of misclassification.  If the I.R.S. or state tax agency determines that a business’ workers are misclassified as independent contractors, the business will be subject to back taxes, interest and penalties which can be significant.   In most cases, especially for smaller businesses, the issue of misclassification never arises.  Workers classified as “independent contractors” fear challenging their employer’s determination. Nonetheless, employers that currently classify workers as independent contractors should reevaluate the classification, particularly as tax agencies are increasingly viewing the use of independent contractors with suspicion.  If there is any doubt, employers can seek the advice of a business attorney and/or file a Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Tax Withholding.

Continue reading

In California, post employment non-competition clauses are generally unenforceable. The prohibition of such clauses stems from the state’s strong public policy favoring freedom of employment and competition, and there can be little doubt that savvy California businesses are aware of this. Yet businesses in San Diego and throughout the state routinely include non-competition clauses in their employment contracts, especially those with upper management. Businesses likely feel justified in including non-compete language because they know it is legal in nearly every other state in the country. In addition, many businesses have legitimate concerns regarding the protection of trade secrets. Companies invest in the creation of customer lists, customer loyalty, and in methods and procedures for maintaining and building a customer base, and they want to protect their investment.

577013_tightrope_walker.jpg

Most employees don’t intend to steal their former employer’s secrets. They are simply interested in taking advantage of employment opportunities. The problem arises because of the difficulties in distinguishing between a former employee’s inappropriate use of trade secrets and that same employee’s utilization of personal skill and experience for the new employer. Competitors often solicit business from the same customer pool and use similar mechanisms to seek out and maintain a customer base. Who can say for certain that the former employee isn’t soliciting clients consistent with the new employer’s standard operating procedures? Whatever the case, California has chosen to err on the side of competition.

Employers, on the other hand, have chosen to err on the side of inclusion. Despite their illegality, businesses still include non-compete clauses in their employment contracts. Most prospective employees are unaware of California’s employment laws and are unlikely to consult an attorney, and employers know that in most cases their employees will honor non-compete agreements upon the termination of their employment.  Moreover, employers merge non-compete language with trade secret language. If a former employee chooses to go to work for a competitor, employers will look past the non-compete language and allege theft of trade secrets. California courts have long recognized a “trade secrets” exception to the prohibition on non-compete clauses. By alleging theft of trade secrets, employers reduce the risk of having the case dismissed early for failure to state a cause of action, and increase the pressure on the former employee now faced with prolonged and costly litigation. Sometimes, the new employer will absorb the cost, but not often.

At one time or another, every San Diego business owner questions how well their business is protected from risk, liabilities and infringement. Should they incorporate, form an LLC or partnership? Does the current business entity offer the best tax advantages? Are their personal assets protected? What are their rights and obligations under leases and contracts? Are key contracts enforceable should there be a dispute? Can existing contracts be improved? Are trademarks, logos and business names protected from infringement? Could they be infringing on others’ trademarks? Is there any legal exposure to the company from its website and blog? Is insurance adequate? Do insurance policies meet regulatory requirements for the business or meet the minimum standards agreed to in a lease agreement? Is the company in compliance with government regulations pertaining to employees? Do they need to consult an attorney? The list is as long as businesses are prolific. For most new and growing businesses, addressing every potential legal issue is cost prohibitive. However, an attorney evaluation summarizing and assessing areas of concern is within reach for most businesses. Once an assessment is provided, business owners can better prioritize and plan for the future.

935841___dice__.jpg

Virtually every car owner at one time or another has taken their car in for service. Most often, the service includes a check up of every major component of your car. Brakes, fluid levels, suspension, tires and electronics are all examined and in the end you are provided a list of recommended repairs and maintenance. Some of the suggested repairs stem from visual inspection and others are derived from manufacturers’ mileage triggered recommendations. It’s not uncommon for folks to prioritize perhaps electing to have the front brakes replaced and a tune up performed while putting off the replacement of shocks, hoses, and the water pump. Ultimately, whatever decision the consumer makes regarding actual repairs, the cost of the examination is relatively small and the examination alerts the owner of potential trouble spots.

A business lawyer can perform the same kind of affordable analysis for your business – they can evaluate your business profile from top to bottom, provide an assessment of the current state of affairs, highlight areas of risk and other areas requiring attention and make recommendations regarding priorities. This type of evaluation can generally be performed for a flat fee which would be determined by the size of your business. Once completed, the business owner (like the automobile owner above) can prioritize. Whatever decision the business owner makes, at the very least, he or she has been alerted to potential trouble spots and can plan to address those concerns as time and economics permit.

Most people don’t think about zoning laws when they first decide to start a business out of their home, and most home-based businesses never hear from local governments about zoning violations even where they are clearly in violation of local zoning laws. The reason why is that most home-based businesses are stealthy. Modern technology allows entrepreneurs to conduct virtually all aspects of a business’ operations (short of manufacturing and direct sales) without leaving the computer. Employees can work from their own homes, products can be delivered via on-line companies and services can be provided off site. So long as signs aren’t posted, traffic isn’t increased beyond what is normal for residential neighborhoods and excess noise isn’t a factor, no one notices that a home-based business even exists. In fact, a neighbor’s complaints are generally the only thing that ever puts a home-based business on a local government’s radar.

568660_wireless_home_office.jpg

So what’s all the fuss about zoning laws? Although most home-based businesses are stealthy, some business owners are looking to more visible home-based options. The recession has encouraged many would be entrepreneurs to consider starting a business, and one of their first major cost decisions is location. For a small business requiring employees, product assembly and manufacturing, customer visits, vendor deliveries or any combination of the preceding, understanding local zoning ordinances is critical. Otherwise, they risk being shut down. 

Some localities forbid home based offices completely. Others allow home based offices for professionals such as lawyers, doctors and accountants. Even the most liberal of localities will allow home based businesses only under certain circumstances, and the zoning laws can vary greatly from municipality to municipality. Generally, they have the following in common: they require that the business be only incidental to the home as living quarters taking up less than a certain percentage of the home’s overall space; they require that all employees of the business reside in the home; they require that increased vendor and customer traffic is not beyond what is normal for the residential neighborhood; they prohibit the use of equipment that creates a nuisance such as noise, vibration or fumes that are detectable outside of the home; they prohibit the use and storage of hazardous materials; they prohibit the warehousing of business inventory; and they prohibit any changes to the outside appearance of the home (including signage).

If you are considering a home based business that for any reason will be noticed by neighbors, it’s important to know the zoning laws in your locality. The easiest way to check your local zoning laws is at the main branch of your public library. You can also contact your local Planning or Zoning office. However, it’s probably better not to put yourself on their radar. It may be better to have a friend in the neighborhood call and check for you. You can also try contacting the city clerk’s office or your local Chamber of Commerce, or check your city’s home page online. If you live in or are considering moving to a planned community with a homeowner’s association, the CC&Rs (covenants, conditions and restrictions) are likely even more restrictive than those set forth above.

Continue reading

Avoiding Litigation – Part One sets forth three pre-conflict practices useful in reducing your business’ risk of litigation. Of course, avoiding all conflict is virtually impossible. However, conflict does not inevitably lead to litigation. In fact, more than 90% of all conflict is resolved before reaching the courthouse steps. Below are three practices useful in avoiding litigation after conflict has arisen:

658238_u_s__supreme_court_hallway.jpg

Act Fast. The worse thing anyone can do is ignore a potential conflict. If you receive a letter, phone call or personal visit from an unhappy customer, vendor or client, respond immediately. In most cases, the problem will not go away because you chose to ignore it. The problem will more likely get worse. Communication is a powerful tool that can diffuse even the most heated dispute. The faster you act, the more easily the problem will be to resolve. Being responsive often puts the other side off guard. They are poised for a battle and when you call to offer a solution, they’re not quite sure how to respond. If you are behind on a debt, offer a payment solution that is workable for you. Offering a payment solution you can’t ultimately adhere to is worse than ignoring the problem. If you cannot fully perform, offer creative alternatives. Whatever your response, it will be better received if it provides options. If there is disagreement about your rights and obligations under an agreement, offer to sit down and discuss the issue. Don’t be rigid. Explain your beliefs politely but be sure to leave the door open for a compromise. Conflict and anger breed more conflict and more anger. In the end, you don’t have to agree to anything. However, open and conciliatory communication opens the door to a wider range of potential resolutions. Acting fast is no less important where you are seeking redress. If you are owed a past due debt, don’t rest on your laurels. The fact that there is no doubt about the debt doesn’t guarantee payment, especially without litigation. It remains costly for you to sue. Instead, contact the debtor and ask whether there is a problem. Offer to work with them to resolve the debt as quickly and as efficiently as possible. They will appreciate your offer, and likely never forget it. If it appears your efforts at informal resolution are ignored, try asking an attorney to write the other side a letter. A litigation attorney can concisely set forth the legal realities for the other side and can usually do this at a relatively low cost. Be sure your attorney understands your commitment to resolving the matter without the need for litigation.

Be Willing To Compromise. No matter the strength of your bargaining position, litigation is expensive. For new and growing businesses, it is prohibitive. Large businesses and corporations can more readily afford a legal battle, but there is little benefit to litigating a matter that could have been informally resolved at a much lower cost to the company. Even where larger concerns are at issue such as fear of opening the floodgates to repetitive litigation, looking to a compromise may help avoid worst case scenarios. Think about the prospect of litigation. What will it cost you in terms of aggravation, time, money and goodwill? Take a hard look at the matter before you and consider alternatives that might be acceptable to you – weigh the costs of the compromise against the aggravation, time, money and goodwill you will exhaust during a court battle. These costs cannot be overstated. Compromise may be the single most important practice in avoiding litigation. It is also the hardest practice for most businesses to swallow.

Continue reading

Contact Information